Lets look at the pros and cons of rental and builtin webdisk

Let's consider the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.



Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.

It is because it really is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.



Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.

It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.

If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the thought of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which can be fully built in Soho, so the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.



It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.



Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files on the internet at a fixed monthly cost. This means that the usage of web hard is becoming common.



But it's not just recently that this concept came out, and it's true that it is been a long time. When it came out, many people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won't adopt it.



In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), that is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. p2p 순위 Because the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Due to this fact, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it's a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.



Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one based on the reality and needs.